AI for Piping Estimation

ASME B31.3 for process piping and B16.5 for flanges, with your own pipe class sheets layered on top. The counts are seeded on the codes you already estimate under - not guessed by a model that's never seen a class sheet.

PDFs, native or scanned. CAD. 3D model exports where they exist. Real bid packages are messy - mixed revisions, scanned sheets, drawings that were faxed at some point in their life. That's the normal case, and the engine is built for it.

Off the branch table in your pipe class sheet - which is the only place the answer actually lives. The engine resolves the branch type from the class and the line sizes either side of it, rather than trying to read intent off the symbol.

Lengths come from isometrics and scaled general arrangements. They do not come from P&IDs - a P&ID isn't to scale, and any tool that claims a length off one is guessing. When the package has isos, theTakeoff reads lengths and spool breaks off them directly.

Yes. Show the engine one instance and it finds the rest across the set. Every drawing office has its own legend, and no model ships knowing yours.

Hours, against the weeks a manual takeoff runs. On an industrial piping package the grind is ~875 estimator-hours; theTakeoff takes it to ~300 - and most of those 300 are verification, not counting.

Excel-native, evidence-linked, mapped to your template. The quantities land in the format your pricing sheet already expects.

No. Packages run to hundreds of sheets and that's the design point - the bigger the set, the more the manual approach breaks down.

Your drawings stay yours. ISO 27001-certified infrastructure, and your project data is never used to train models for anyone else.